Hi i play bf1 on my dell 7567 and have this issue. I play at medium and the fps alway around 50-62. I also try all low setting but nothing happen. Download MSI Afterburner and make sure pcsx2 is using your GPU. If it's not, download the latest drivers from Nvidia's site, not Dell's.

1. Dell 7567 Msi Afterburner

125 High Speed Mode (125HSM) is Broadcom's proprietary frame-bursting and compression technology to improve 802.11gwireless LAN performance. The throughputtransmission speed limit when using 125HSM is claimed to be up to 35–40% higher than standard 802.11g.

The '125' in '125 High Speed Mode' refers to performance at a theoretical signaling rate of 125 Mbit/s: a 125HSM device can achieve a maximum throughput of 34.1 Mbit/s, which is the equivalent throughput of a system strictly following all 802.11g protocols and operating at a signaling rate of 125 Mbit/s.^{[citation needed]}

When 125HSM was originally announced in 2004, it was called Afterburner. It is currently marketed as a proprietary extension of Broadcom's Xpress technology, their standards-based frame-bursting approach that is supported by their 54g Wi-Fichipsets.

Vendors[edit]

Other vendors have marketed 125HSM products under a variety of names: Tomb raider walkthrough.

• g+ SuperSpeed (ZyXEL) (This one uses the G++ Technology solution from Texas Instruments, which uses 125 Mbit/s as well but may or may not be compatible to Broadcom's solution)^{[citation needed]}
• G Plus or HSM (Belkin)
• 125* High Speed or Turbo G (Buffalo)
• SpeedBooster (Linksys)
• 125M or 125 High Speed or 125* High Speed (Asus)
• 125 Mbit/s 802.11g

Manufacturers that have licensed 125HSM technology from Broadcom include Belkin, Buffalo Technology, Dell, Gateway, Hewlett-Packard, Asus, Linksys (now part of Belkin), Motorola, U.S. Robotics and Netcomm. In general^[who?], 125HSM products from different vendors are all interoperable in 125HSM mode.^{[citation needed]}

Interoperability[edit]

• These (and similar) proprietary extensions are incompatible across different wi-fi chips vendors. So to make wi-fi links work in 125 HSM mode, both sides should use chips from same vendor (e.g. Broadcom). In most real-world scenarios such modes are simply useless due to different chips used by different devices.^{[citation needed]}
• Existence of several similar technologies with different branding and incompatible with each other causes massive consumer confusion.
• These technologies are marketed in such a way it is possible to see them as cheating and tricking consumers through technology branding. This type of network will never be able to reach 125 Mbit/s as real data throughput; 125 Mbit/s is the maximum data rate before accounting for overhead. This causes consumer frustration due to failed expectations. For instance, the average consumer would expect a 125 Mbit/s wireless link to outperform a standard 100 Mbit/s wired link while, in fact, 100 Mbit/s wired link will be much faster; a standard wired 100Mbit/s 100BaseT link is approximately three times faster than 125HSM in simplex mode (i.e. transmitting or receiving only) and six times faster than 125HSM in full-duplex mode (i.e. both transmitting and receiving data—which is typical during file transfers between two computers connected to the same hub).^{[citation needed]} In other words, even under ideal conditions, 125 HSM mode may only deliver anywhere from a third to one sixth the data transfer speed of a standard 100 Mbit/s wired LAN link.^{[citation needed]}

Dell 7567 Msi Afterburner

Alternatives[edit]

125HSM is one of several competing incompatible proprietary extension approaches that were developed to increase performance of 802.11g wireless devices, such as Super G (or '108 Mbit/s' technology) from Atheros,^[1]MIMO-based extensions from Airgo Networks, and Nitro from Conexant

125HSM can be more successful^{[by whom?]} in radio-dense environments than non-standard channel bonding approaches to enhance 802.11g performance.^{[citation needed]} Broadcom claims that in the real-world, 125HSM provides up to 17% better performance over channel bonding approaches such as Super G because other ISM band devices—such as neighboring wireless networks, cordless telephones, baby monitors, and Bluetooth devices—can interfere with channel bonding at distances of up to 150 feet (46 m).^{[citation needed]}

See also[edit]

References[edit]

1. ^Mellor, Chris (November 10, 2003). 'Nexsan's ATAbaby for D2D backup'. techworld. Retrieved 6 June 2019.

External links[edit]

• Press release announcing 125HSM as Afterburner
• 125 High Speed Mode page within the 54g Wi-Fi technology site
• KeyLabs benchmark comparison of 125 Mbit/s products by US Robotics, Linksys, Netgear, Belkin, and DLink. Also comparisons to some 'Draft 802.11n' competitors.
• Article at SmallNetBuilder (formerly Tom's Hardware Guide) testing 125HSM performance
• Short article on various 802.11g boosters

Hi everybody

I have a Dell G7 with the i7 8750H, Gtx 1060 max Q and Ram 16 Gb configuration. It has BIOS which is 1.3.0

Undervolt with ThrottleStop at -0.164 V. Actually I don't feel the temperature changes too much. I reached about 70 ° C during the stress test with Prime 95. Cpu received 3.9 Ghz and never dropped when I played the game.

I have heard that Gtx 1060 max Q is slightly weaker than the standard Gtx 1060 so I made overclocking with MSI Afterburner.

Since this is the first time I did it took a lot of time, I finally set up with +205 Core and +407 Mem. Stress test with FurMark, the GPU receives 60-65 ° C.

This is the result with Firestrike: non-overclock / overclock

Benchmark by Far Cry V Ultra 1080P + HD texture. I got 67 FPS when overclock ( 61 FPS when non-overclock) .

If anyone who did the Overclock / Undervolt on Dell G7 can share better setting, should I use another software (software name?) To test the stability of the GPU? Should I overclock to a higher level ?
Update:
Resident evil 2 Ultra 1080p, Sometimes I have the maximum core clock for both Cpu and Gpu.